Termination w.r.t. Q proof of TRS/nontermin/CSREx1

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g₁(X) -> h₁(X)
c -> d
h₁(d) -> g₁(c)

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g₁(X) -> h₁(X)
c -> d
h₁(d) -> g₁(c)

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,13] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

G₁(X) -> H₁(X)
H₁(d) -> G₁(c)
H₁(d) -> C

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g₁(X) -> h₁(X)
c -> d
h₁(d) -> g₁(c)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

G₁(X) -> H₁(X)
H₁(d) -> G₁(c)
H₁(d) -> C

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g₁(X) -> h₁(X)
c -> d
h₁(d) -> g₁(c)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [13,14,18] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

G₁(X) -> H₁(X)
H₁(d) -> G₁(c)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g₁(X) -> h₁(X)
c -> d
h₁(d) -> g₁(c)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.